Barclays Cycle
Superhighway (source - Transport for London)
Mayor of London Boris Johnson has said cyclists need to
take responsibility for their own safety following a nine-day period in which
collisions with large vehicles claimed the lives of five cyclists in the
capital. While he clearly states he wasn’t trying to blame the victims in those
specific incidents, an opposition politician has accused him of doing just
that, describing his remarks as “an insult to the dead.”
Speaking to radio station LBC’s Nick Ferrari this morning, Mr Johnson maintained that
cyclists were obliged to follow the rules of the road and to comply with
traffic signs.
He said: “Some of the cases that we've seen in the last
few days really make your heart bleed because you can see that people have
taken decisions that really did put their lives in danger.
"You cannot blame the victim in these circumstances.
But what you can say is that when people make decisions on the road that are
very risky – jumping red lights, moving across fast-moving traffic in a way
that is completely unexpected and without looking to see what traffic is doing
– it's very difficult for the traffic engineers to second-guess that."
No suggestion has been made by police investigating the
five fatalities this month, three of which occurred on or near Barclays Cycle
Superhighway CS2 in east London, that the people who died were riding their
bikes in such a way as to endanger their own lives.
On Twitter this morning, Labour’s former transport secretary Lord
Adonis had urged Mr Johnson to take action, saying: "The mayor should
appoint a rapid independent review of superhighways after the horror of all
these cyclist deaths in London."
However, rejecting calls for an urgent review of the
safety of cyclists in the city, Mr Johnson said that unless riders complied
with traffic laws, "there's no amount of traffic engineering that we
invest in that is going to save people's lives."
Quoted in the Guardian, Green London Assembly member Darren Johnson accused
the Mayor of victim blaming and of "dodging responsibility."
He pointed out: “Four out of the five deaths of cyclists
in the last nine days have involved either his blue paint or his red buses.
"The mayor's comments this morning which targeted
cyclists breaking the law as the primary cause of death and serious injury is
an attempt to blame the victims, rather than tackling the real problem of HGVs,
buses and dangerous junctions.
"It is an insult to the dead and injured that the
mayor continues to blame victims in this way, rather than accepting his
responsibility and getting on with fixing the things he has direct control
over."
The succession of fatalities has seen other high profile
politicians call for segregated cycle lanes, such as that on the new section of
CS2, opened last week. The original route from Aldgate to Bow has no such
segregation.
Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg told LBC: "Distressing as all this is, I really hope it
doesn't discourage people from bicycling – it's got to be made safer and we
have got to have more of these bicycling superhighways which physically
separate cyclists from roads.
The Liberal Democrat leader added: "We as a
government have said we want to make new road schemes fit for cyclists and at
the same time we'll look at every other suggestion to make this a safe thing to
do."
The Mayor’s own Cycling Commissioner, Andrew Gilligan,
whom he appointed to that position earlier this year, cautioned against taking
hasty action but criticised CS2.
He told BBC London:
"The danger in the current atmosphere of understandable alarm and concern
is that we rush into some panic measure which actually makes things worse.”
However, Mr Gilligan added: "From the beginning,
Superhighway 2 has been little more than blue paint and I've been pressing to
change it."
National cyclists’ organisation CTC meanwhile called for
new drivers of large vehicles such as lorries, buses and coaches – all three
types of vehicle have been involved in fatalities of cyclists in London this
month – to have to undertake cycle training before they are granted a licence.
The appeal comes as the government prepares to publish a
green paper regarding the training and testing of such vehicles.
CTC’s policy director, Roger Geffen, said: “We will
investigate further options for reducing the number of large vehicles in urban
centres at busy periods.
“Options that the organisation has considered in the past
include banning lorries from city centres at peak periods and locating
distribution centres on the outskirts of cities.”
Its chief executive, Gordon Seabright, added: "CTC
and all cyclists are sickened by the continuing failure to protect cyclists, in
particular from the dangers caused by lorries in our towns and cities. We want
to see The Mayor of London and all those responsible for the safety of our
streets living up to their promises.”
Martin Key, campaigns director at British Cycling, called
for a national cycle awareness initiative to be launched.
"The fact that five cyclists have been killed in
London in the last nine days is shocking news and an urgent investigation needs
to take place into what could have been done to prevent these deaths," he
commented.
"We have to do a better job of looking after each
other on the roads.
"That includes significant investment in a
nationwide cyclist awareness campaign rather than a few posters in a handful of
cities.
“This is about changing the culture of how people get
around, making cycling a more attractive and safer option for millions of
people across Britain."
In its editorial today, the London Evening Standard says that “We can be a
cycling city to rival any other in Europe: we just have to want to make it
happen.”
The cyclist killed last night on one of London’s cycle
superhighways, at Aldgate, is the fifth to die in nine days. The total killed
this year in the capital is now 13. It is a reminder of the inadequacies and
dangers of the blue cycling superhighways. As Debbie Dorling, the widow of the
first cyclist to be killed on one, observes, these are little more than “comfort
blankets”, giving cyclists a false sense of security on dangerous roads while
mostly failing to segregate them from traffic.
The fatalities are tragic — though they should be put in
context. Most London cyclists get to work each day without incident. Annual
deaths have stayed roughly the same over the past decade, despite a huge
increase in the numbers cycling: cycling is proportionately safer than it was.
And motorists generally seem to be more conscious of the vulnerability of
cyclists than they were even five years ago. This is, moreover, a dangerous
time of year, with cycle commuters riding in the dark or dusk.
But a cycling city, which London aspires to be, cannot be
safe only in summer and in optimal conditions: it must be safe in the dark and
rain too. The Mayor has already launched his scheme for a safe cycling network,
and says he will install CCTV at Bow to study the problems. Now he must go much
further. We should consider an independent review into cycle safety in London.
And we need a plan to transform the city’s cycle lanes and junctions, making
much greater use of segregated lanes. TfL must now treat this as a transport
priority.
This is a question of
political will, not physical road space: other changes to our roads once
branded unthinkable, such as bus lanes and the congestion charge, are now
accepted parts of the system. London is a working city with a multiplicity of
road users — cyclists, pedestrians, car and lorry drivers. Yet it should be
possible for all of us to share the roads, given decent provision and mutual
consideration. We can be a cycling city to rival any other in Europe: we just
have to want to make it happen.
